Eric Karns

There is a lot of buzz on the internet(s) about how the elections are rigged. First of all, they say it is unprecedented that the polls taken before the vote in New Hampshire had Obama winning by a landslide, but then when the vote came Hillary won. The funny thing is, in all the larger districts, they use Diebold machines to count the votes as opposed to the smaller districts that count by hand. In every district that used a Diebold machine Hillary had an average of 4.5% above Obama… but in all hand counted districts he won or was much closer to her.

If Obama goes up against any Republican in the general election he wins by at least 10%… but in nationwide polling, if Hillary goes up against republicans, she either loses or is very close. So, someone wants Hillary to be the nominee… then, when the election happens it won’t be as hard for them to cover up the Diebold rigging, because it will be much less suspicious.